linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] nfsd: Implement large extent array support in pNFS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ehmu66bp4rmhqx4nd7vrn6uimx5eyr55psppgevkbdu2xr7lop@yj6xrr6gyvwb>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 10:53:34 +0300
From: Sergey Bashirov <sergeybashirov@...il.com>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, 
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>, NeilBrown <neil@...wn.name>, 
	Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@...hat.com>, Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@...cle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>, 
	Konstantin Evtushenko <koevtushenko@...dex.com>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] nfsd: Implement large extent array support in pNFS

On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 04:35:03PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> Hi Sergey -
>
> Typically we separate the clean-ups from the substantive changes. So
> removing the dprintk call sites would be done in a pre-requisite patch.
> I'm asking you to do it because if I split this patch up, I'm likely to
> get something wrong, and you have a convenient test case.
>
> Also, reposting means your tested version of the series is what gets
> archived on lore.
>
> Would you mind splitting this one up and posting a v4 ?

I agree, this should also make the main patch a bit smaller and easier
to review. I will split the patch.

--
Sergey Bashirov