[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <szadjbcldmcirdtgiv6wowqumlk4cbthb37f3e42lzcbt4tnla@ilp4m6quqk4b>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 11:42:28 +0200
From: Joel Granados <joel.granados@...nel.org>
To: Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@....de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: register_syctl_init error in linux-next-20250612
On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 04:09:04PM +0200, Bert Karwatzki wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, dem 19.06.2025 um 13:50 +0200 schrieb Joel Granados:
> > Hey Bert
> >
> > Thx for the report.
> >
> > I just tested on my https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sysctl/sysctl.git/log/?h=sysctl-next
> > and can't see the issue. Maybe its something that I'm missing in the
> > configuration. Do you happen to have your the .config that you used?
...
> > > +#endif
> > > };
> > >
> > > int __init sysctl_init_bases(void)
> > >
> > >
> > > Bert Karwatzki
>
> I'm running next-20250617 (but I'll also try your sysctl-next branch) with PREEMPT_RT=y, my current theory is that
> the init_rtmutex_sysctl() is corrupting the rbtree (if I remove init_rtmutex_sysctl() everything works
> (with the same .config)), and in the process removes the overflow{uid,gid} files.
I think that the error occurs when the register gets called several
times for the same path, returns an error resulting in a undefined
state. I see that rtmutex.c is included from 4 files, I also see that the
registration happens 4 times.
I just did not understand what was being done in my initial patch. The
fix is to put the sysctl registration in some "main" file (rtmutx_api?)
and to keep the max_lock_depth variable there as well (like it was
originally)
This is my proposal, Does it solve your issue?
diff --git i/include/linux/rtmutex.h w/include/linux/rtmutex.h
index dc9a51cda97c..fa9f1021541e 100644
--- i/include/linux/rtmutex.h
+++ w/include/linux/rtmutex.h
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
#include <linux/rbtree_types.h>
#include <linux/spinlock_types_raw.h>
+extern int max_lock_depth;
+
struct rt_mutex_base {
raw_spinlock_t wait_lock;
struct rb_root_cached waiters;
diff --git i/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c w/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index 705a0e0fd72a..c80902eacd79 100644
--- i/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ w/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -29,29 +29,6 @@
#include "rtmutex_common.h"
#include "lock_events.h"
-/*
- * Max number of times we'll walk the boosting chain:
- */
-static int max_lock_depth = 1024;
-
-static const struct ctl_table rtmutex_sysctl_table[] = {
- {
- .procname = "max_lock_depth",
- .data = &max_lock_depth,
- .maxlen = sizeof(int),
- .mode = 0644,
- .proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
- },
-};
-
-static int __init init_rtmutex_sysctl(void)
-{
- register_sysctl_init("kernel", rtmutex_sysctl_table);
- return 0;
-}
-
-subsys_initcall(init_rtmutex_sysctl);
-
#ifndef WW_RT
# define build_ww_mutex() (false)
# define ww_container_of(rtm) NULL
diff --git i/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c w/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c
index 9e00ea0e5cfa..4fa1acceaebb 100644
--- i/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c
+++ w/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c
@@ -8,6 +8,30 @@
#define RT_MUTEX_BUILD_MUTEX
#include "rtmutex.c"
+/*
+ * Max number of times we'll walk the boosting chain:
+ */
+int max_lock_depth = 1024;
+
+static const struct ctl_table rtmutex_sysctl_table[] = {
+ {
+ .procname = "max_lock_depth",
+ .data = &max_lock_depth,
+ .maxlen = sizeof(int),
+ .mode = 0644,
+ .proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
+ },
+};
+
+static int __init init_rtmutex_sysctl(void)
+{
+ printk("registering rtmutex");
+ register_sysctl_init("kernel", rtmutex_sysctl_table);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+subsys_initcall(init_rtmutex_sysctl);
+
/*
* Debug aware fast / slowpath lock,trylock,unlock
*
--
Joel Granados
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (660 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists