lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <agdzhkcb7f7w7zmcivjx6gnlilwglvd526pp3p5cgkdricwfx4@6iduwkqkerjp>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 13:11:30 +0200
From: Joel Granados <joel.granados@...nel.org>
To: Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@....de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org, 
	Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: register_syctl_init error in linux-next-20250612

On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 11:37:40AM +0200, Bert Karwatzki wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, dem 19.06.2025 um 14:39 +0200 schrieb Joel Granados:
> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 07:55:13PM +0200, Bert Karwatzki wrote:
> > > When starting evolution (gnome email client) on my debian sid with
> > > linux-next-20250612 I get the following error message on the terminal
> > > emulator (the Gtk messages also occur  when):
> > > 
> > > Gtk-Message: 13:34:49.069: Failed to load module "colorreload-gtk-module"
> > > Gtk-Message: 13:34:49.070: Failed to load module "window-decorations-gtk-module"
> > > Gtk-Message: 13:34:51.012: Failed to load module "colorreload-gtk-module"
> > > Gtk-Message: 13:34:51.013: Failed to load module "window-decorations-gtk-module"
> > > bwrap: Can't read /proc/sys/kernel/overflowuid: No such file or directory
> > > 
> > > ** (org.gnome.Evolution:3327): ERROR **: 13:34:51.245: Failed to fully launch dbus-proxy: Der Kindprozess wurde mit Status 1 beendet
> > > Trace/Breakpoint ausgelöst
> > > 
> > > and the following message in dmesg:
> > > 
> > > [  305.600587] [      T3327] traps: evolution[3327] trap int3 ip:7f64442d3ab7 sp:7ffc9f4e94d0 error:0 in libglib-2.0.so.0.8400.2[66ab7,7f644428c000+a1000]
> > > 
> > > I bisected this to commit cf47285025e6 ("locking/rtmutex: Move max_lock_depth
> > > into rtmutex.c"). The absence of /proc/sys/kernel/overflow{uid,gid} seems to be the related
> > > to the start failure, in affected kernel version the files are absent while they're present
> > > when evolution starts normally.
> > I just tested with next-20250619 and I see /proc/sys/kernel/overflow{uid,gid}
> > 
> > > 
> > > Also when booting next-20250612 I get this error message regarding max_lock_depth and
> > > rtmutex_sysctl_table:
> > > 
> > > [    0.234399] [         T1] sysctl duplicate entry: /kernel/max_lock_depth
> > > [    0.234402] [         T1] failed when register_sysctl_sz rtmutex_sysctl_table to kernel
> > > [    0.234405] [         T1] sysctl duplicate entry: /kernel/max_lock_depth
> > > [    0.234407] [         T1] failed when register_sysctl_sz rtmutex_sysctl_table to kernel
> > And I do not see these messages in my dmesg. And
> > /proc/sys/kernel/max_lock_depth exists.
> > 
> > Maybe its something that only happened with the version from the 12th?
> > Could you test again with the version from the 19?
> > 
> > Best
> 
> I tested next-202506{12,17,19} and sysctl-next and they all show the buggy behaviour.
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT=y is needed for the bug to appear.
Hey

I have managed to reproduce, thx for the clarification.

Did you have the chance to test with the patch that I sent?

Best

-- 

Joel Granados

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (660 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ