linux-kernel - Re: Linux 6.16-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjYB7tvFoqsL3aED9YZ2eusi9dMc=ckPzF-dnrRsERBUA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 08:59:46 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, 
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>, Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 6.16-rc1

On Sat, 21 Jun 2025 at 05:44, Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> I don't have much idea of how people use qemu for testing, but since you
> say this is important for testing workloads, I can take a deeper dive
> next week and have an answer by -rc4.

Thanks. I'm not sure *how* important this is, but if it affects
Guenter's test coverage, I assume it affects others too.

But it's not entirely clear how much it *does* affect Guenter. He says
five failed tests, but those are all accounted for by the master
device thing.

Guenter, maybe you can clarify?

             Linus