linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] i2c-host-fixes for v6.16-rc3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aFcTE3XBrkdENtgD@shikoro>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 22:16:19 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] i2c-host-fixes for v6.16-rc3

Hi Andi,

> I've collected one fix for rc3. It’s rebased on top of the latest
> patch you merged from my fixes branch, which in turn is based on
> rc2, so there's no tag for it.

Hmm, rebasing to rc2 was probably a not so good idea. After I pulled
your branch, I now have the Tegra patch from rc1 twice. So, I will
"drop" this pull request and apply the k1 patch myself with your tag.
I think this is the easiest solution...

> I still haven't had the chance to read your naming conversion
> series, last week has been quite packed. If you feel it's ready
> to move forward, please go ahead. Otherwise, if you can give me
> one more week, I'll make sure to review it properly.

Oh, the patch is fine. It is just a scripted search-and-replace,
verified by buildbots. I didn't want a review, just an OK that I am not
interfering with a plan of yours I might be unaware of.

Have a nice weekend, too!

   Wolfram

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)