[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y0tkc0gx.fsf@trenco.lwn.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 14:18:38 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>, Christian Brauner
<brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: Luca Boccassi <luca.boccassi@...il.com>, Oleg Nesterov
<oleg@...hat.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/sysctl: coredump: add %F for pidfd number
Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org> writes:
> In commit b5325b2a270f ("coredump: hand a pidfd to the usermode coredump
> helper") a new core_pattern specifier, %F, was added to provide a pidfs
> to the usermode helper process referring to the crashed process.
>
> Update the documentation to include the new core_pattern specifier.
>
> Link: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/37125
> Link: https://lwn.net/Articles/1024160/
> Signed-off-by: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>
> ---
> Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Applied, thanks.
> FWIW, I was not sure if I should add a 'Fixes: b5325b2a270f
> ("coredump: hand a pidfd to the usermode coredump helper") to make
> sure that it get backported as well to the series where a backport of
> b5325b2a270f landed.
A Fixes tag is not sufficient to ensure that a patch is backported to
previous kernels - you must CC stable@...r.kernel.org to be sure. In
this case, it's a documentation tweak for a 6.16 change, so I don't
think there is a lot of urgency here.
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists