lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025062111-detonate-clapped-b630@gregkh>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 09:20:37 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	LINUX SPDX ML <linux-spdx@...r.kernel.org>,
	LINUX KERNEL ML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] LICENSES: refresh FSF GFDL/GPL licences

On Sat, Jun 21, 2025 at 03:21:13AM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> Old licences have been modified, because FSF postal address was changed:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2024-09/msg00000.html
> https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/fsf-office-closing-party
> https://www.fsf.org/about/contact/mailing
> 
> Just "cut and paste" from original sources:
> https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/fdl-1.1.txt
> https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/fdl-1.2.txt
> https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-1.0.txt
> https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.txt
> 
> Relevant change: postal address was replaced with an URL.

You also changed whitespace and some terms, and did not describe that
here, why?

This license text comes from the SPDX repo, why not use that instead?

Or better yet, _JUST_ change the address, if that is correct with what
the FSF has published, and that's it.  Unneeded whitespace issues are
not a good idea and not needed at all.

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ