[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025062157-framing-designed-76cd@gregkh>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 09:21:28 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LINUX SPDX ML <linux-spdx@...r.kernel.org>,
LINUX KERNEL ML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] LICENSES: refresh FSF LGPL licences
On Sat, Jun 21, 2025 at 03:21:14AM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> Old licences have been modified, because FSF postal address was changed:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2024-09/msg00000.html
> https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/fsf-office-closing-party
> https://www.fsf.org/about/contact/mailing
>
> Just "cut and paste" from original sources:
> https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/lgpl-2.0.txt
> https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/lgpl-2.1.txt
>
> Relevant change: postal address was replaced with an URL.
>
> There are many changes, because the original text from
> spdx.org is a bit odd. Maybe an old copy :-?
Please don't reformat everything for no good reason. Let's stick with
what spdx has as that is what everyone has agreed on.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists