[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250623052336.d7lllm64yfyjfqu7@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 10:53:36 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: armada-8k: make both cpu masks static
On 20-06-25, 13:14, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> An earlier patch marked one of the two CPU masks as 'static' to reduce stack
> usage, but if CONFIG_NR_CPUS is large enough, the function still produces
> a warning for compile testing:
>
> drivers/cpufreq/armada-8k-cpufreq.c: In function 'armada_8k_cpufreq_init':
> drivers/cpufreq/armada-8k-cpufreq.c:203:1: error: the frame size of 1416 bytes is larger than 1408 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
>
> Normally this should be done using alloc_cpumask_var(), but since the
> driver already has a static mask and the probe function is not called
> concurrently, use the same trick for both.
>
> Fixes: 1ffec650d07f ("cpufreq: armada-8k: Avoid excessive stack usage")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/armada-8k-cpufreq.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
Applied. Thanks.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists