[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aFmYwcO9tJ4byxjz@surfacebook.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 21:11:13 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: "Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] serial: 8250: extract serial8250_init_mctrl()
Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 09:46:02AM +0200, Jiri Slaby (SUSE) kirjoitti:
> After commit 795158691cc0 ("serial: 8250: extract
> serial8250_initialize()"), split serial8250_initialize() even more --
> the mctrl part of this code can be separated into
> serial8250_init_mctrl() -- done now.
...
> +static void serial8250_init_mctrl(struct uart_port *port)
> +{
> + struct uart_8250_port *up = up_to_u8250p(port);
> +
> + if (up->port.flags & UPF_FOURPORT) {
> + if (!up->port.irq)
> + up->port.mctrl |= TIOCM_OUT1;
I am not sure I understand why it was changed from using port directly to
up->port.
> + } else
> + /*
> + * Most PC uarts need OUT2 raised to enable interrupts.
> + */
> + if (port->irq)
> + up->port.mctrl |= TIOCM_OUT2;
Having {} in this branch is also better.
> + serial8250_set_mctrl(port, port->mctrl);
> +}
...
I specifically left below to point out the original code.
> - if (port->flags & UPF_FOURPORT) {
> - if (!port->irq)
> - port->mctrl |= TIOCM_OUT1;
> - } else {
> - /* Most PC uarts need OUT2 raised to enable interrupts. */
> - if (port->irq)
> - port->mctrl |= TIOCM_OUT2;
> - }
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists