[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aFj2u3Tv4o72Hqi8@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 09:39:55 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <Jean-Baptiste.Maneyrol@....com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] iio: imu: inv_icm42600: Convert to uXX and sXX
integer types
On Sat, Jun 21, 2025 at 06:13:39PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 21:33:46 +0300
> Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 5:43 PM Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol
> > <Jean-Baptiste.Maneyrol@....com> wrote:
> > > >From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
> > > >Sent: Monday, June 16, 2025 16:33
...
> > > it is good for me if we can add Cc to stable.
> > > I don't know if I need to add the Cc tag here or when a fixed patch will
> > > require the rework. In doubt, here it is.
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jean-baptiste.maneyrol@....com>
> > > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> >
> > It makes no sense here. This is a standalone change. It's not part of
> > any "fixes" series. You need to attach this patch to your series as
> > patch 1 and mark Cc stable all of the patches.
>
> I think this is hypothetical at the moment as the only series outstanding
> is the WOM one which isn't a fix. So I don't think this patch will
> ever end up carrying a stable tag. However, first time we get a fix
> that needs it, if Greg etc don't sort it out anyway (they often do!)
> then a simple mail to stable@...r.kernel.org to tell them to pick this
> and the fix will resolve it.
>
> For now I'll queue this patch up and ask for a rebase on the WOM
> series on top of it.
>
> It crossed with David's series doing {} to replace explicit memsets
> so needed a tiny bit of hand tweaking.
> Pushed out as testing for 0-day to look at.
Thanks, Jonathan!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists