linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Loongarch irq-redirect supprot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <10014657-8756-f31a-c3b4-f175b764346c@loongson.cn>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 09:13:31 +0800
From: Tianyang Zhang <zhangtianyang@...ngson.cn>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, chenhuacai@...nel.org,
 kernel@...0n.name, corbet@....net, alexs@...nel.org, si.yanteng@...ux.dev,
 jiaxun.yang@...goat.com, peterz@...radead.org, wangliupu@...ngson.cn,
 lvjianmin@...ngson.cn, maobibo@...ngson.cn, siyanteng@...oftware.com.cn,
 gaosong@...ngson.cn, yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn
Cc: loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Super User <root@...alhost.localdomain>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Loongarch irq-redirect supprot

Hi, Thomas

在 2025/6/13 下午10:02, Thomas Gleixner 写道:
> On Tue, Jun 10 2025 at 19:42, Tianyang Zhang wrote:
>> From: Super User <root@...alhost.localdomain>
> That's a valid developer name :)
Sorry , it's a realy stupid fault.....
>
>> This series of patches introduces support for interrupt-redirect
>> controllers, and this hardware feature will be supported on 3C6000
>> for the first time
>>
>> change log:
>> 	v3->v4
>> 	1.Provide reasonable comments on the modifications made to IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE	
> That's not really what I asked for:
>
>    "This change really wants to be seperate with a proper explanation and
>     not burried inside of this pile of changes."
>
> Emphasis on _seperate_, which translates to:
>
>    "Put it into a seperate patch with a proper changelog explaining this
>     modification and why it is correct."
>
> You still have burried this in the whole pile of unrelated changes.
>
> Thanks,
>
>          tglx

Okay, I thought it was just a dissatisfaction with the "inclusion" of 
some changes. I will try to modify it here


Tianyang