lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aFkUETH_R30-CNOX@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 11:45:05 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
	Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Sunil V L <sunilvl@...tanamicro.com>,
	Rahul Pathak <rpathak@...tanamicro.com>,
	Leyfoon Tan <leyfoon.tan@...rfivetech.com>,
	Atish Patra <atish.patra@...ux.dev>,
	Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
	Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>,
	Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/23] mailbox: Allow controller specific mapping
 using fwnode

On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 05:43:40PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> Introduce optional fw_node() callback which allows a mailbox controller
> driver to provide controller specific mapping using fwnode.
> 
> The Linux OF framework already implements fwnode operations for the
> Linux DD framework so the fw_xlate() callback works fine with device
> tree as well.

...

> +	fwnode = dev_fwnode(dev);
> +	if (!fwnode) {
> +		dev_dbg(dev, "No owner fwnode\n");
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = fwnode_property_get_reference_args(dev_fwnode(dev), "mboxes",

Why not using fwnode directly here?

> +						 "#mbox-cells", 0, index, &fwspec);
>  	if (ret) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "%s: can't parse \"mboxes\" property\n", __func__);
> +		dev_err(dev, "%s: can't parse \"%s\" property\n", __func__, "mboxes");
>  		return ERR_PTR(ret);
>  	}

...

Otherwise looks like a good solution to get rid of OF-centric code from mailbox
in the future.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ