lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aFkcf6it0bW36jdw@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 12:21:03 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/defconfigs: Explicitly unset CONFIG_64BIT in
 i386_defconfig

On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 11:06:42AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 10:25:36AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > From: Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
> > 
> > A recent refresh of the defconfigs got rid of the following
> > (unset) config:
> > 
> >   # CONFIG_64BIT is not set
> > 
> > Innocuous as it seems, when the config file is saved again the
> > behavior is changed so that CONFIG_64BIT=y.
> > 
> > Currently,
> > 
> >   $ make i386_defconfig
> >   $ grep CONFIG_64BIT .config
> >   CONFIG_64BIT=y
> > 
> > whereas previously (and with this patch):
> > 
> >   $ make i386_defconfig
> >   $ grep CONFIG_64BIT .config
> >   # CONFIG_64BIT is not set
> > 
> > Fixes: 0e11f689ec03 ("x86/kconfig/32: Refresh defconfig")
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>

> No SOB by Daniel?

Ah, this is just a cherry-pick (with fixing conflicts, updated Fixes
and removed the last paragraph) of 5y.o. 76366050eb1b ("x86/defconfigs:
Explicitly unset CONFIG_64BIT in i386_defconfig"), it should be standalone
patch. I borrowed the commit message.  So, whatever you prefer: I can send
it again as the original one, one of x86 maintainers can do themselves
the cherry-picking / conflict resolution, or I can resend it as mine.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ