[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aFkcf6it0bW36jdw@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 12:21:03 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/defconfigs: Explicitly unset CONFIG_64BIT in
i386_defconfig
On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 11:06:42AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 10:25:36AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > From: Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
> >
> > A recent refresh of the defconfigs got rid of the following
> > (unset) config:
> >
> > # CONFIG_64BIT is not set
> >
> > Innocuous as it seems, when the config file is saved again the
> > behavior is changed so that CONFIG_64BIT=y.
> >
> > Currently,
> >
> > $ make i386_defconfig
> > $ grep CONFIG_64BIT .config
> > CONFIG_64BIT=y
> >
> > whereas previously (and with this patch):
> >
> > $ make i386_defconfig
> > $ grep CONFIG_64BIT .config
> > # CONFIG_64BIT is not set
> >
> > Fixes: 0e11f689ec03 ("x86/kconfig/32: Refresh defconfig")
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> No SOB by Daniel?
Ah, this is just a cherry-pick (with fixing conflicts, updated Fixes
and removed the last paragraph) of 5y.o. 76366050eb1b ("x86/defconfigs:
Explicitly unset CONFIG_64BIT in i386_defconfig"), it should be standalone
patch. I borrowed the commit message. So, whatever you prefer: I can send
it again as the original one, one of x86 maintainers can do themselves
the cherry-picking / conflict resolution, or I can resend it as mine.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists