[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250624-monotype-disorder-aedee5ef7cfa@spud>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 16:59:58 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Alok Tiwari <alok.a.tiwari@...cle.com>
Cc: conor.dooley@...rochip.com, daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com,
mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: microchip: mpfs: Fix incorrect MSSPLL ID in error
message
On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 11:03:49AM -0700, Alok Tiwari wrote:
> The error message in mpfs_clk_register_mssplls() incorrectly
> printed a constant CLK_MSSPLL_INTERNAL instead of the actual
> PLL ID that failed to register.
Huh, that's weird. Did you actually encounter this happening, or is this
some sort of patch based on the output from a tool?
I ask because I don't see how this could ever actually report a
constant, when the array it loops over only has a single element.
Feels like we should just do something like the following (if we do
anything at all)
Cheers,
Conor.
diff --git a/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs.c b/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs.c
index c22632a7439c5..ed6d5e6ff98ec 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs.c
@@ -148,22 +148,18 @@ static struct mpfs_msspll_hw_clock mpfs_msspll_clks[] = {
};
static int mpfs_clk_register_mssplls(struct device *dev, struct mpfs_msspll_hw_clock *msspll_hws,
- unsigned int num_clks, struct mpfs_clock_data *data)
+ struct mpfs_clock_data *data)
{
- unsigned int i;
+ struct mpfs_msspll_hw_clock *msspll_hw = &msspll_hws[0];
int ret;
- for (i = 0; i < num_clks; i++) {
- struct mpfs_msspll_hw_clock *msspll_hw = &msspll_hws[i];
+ msspll_hw->base = data->msspll_base;
+ ret = devm_clk_hw_register(dev, &msspll_hw->hw);
+ if (ret)
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to register msspll id: %d\n",
+ CLK_MSSPLL_INTERNAL);
- msspll_hw->base = data->msspll_base;
- ret = devm_clk_hw_register(dev, &msspll_hw->hw);
- if (ret)
- return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to register msspll id: %d\n",
- CLK_MSSPLL_INTERNAL);
-
- data->hw_data.hws[msspll_hw->id] = &msspll_hw->hw;
- }
+ data->hw_data.hws[msspll_hw->id] = &msspll_hw->hw;
return 0;
}
@@ -386,8 +382,7 @@ static int mpfs_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
clk_data->dev = dev;
dev_set_drvdata(dev, clk_data);
- ret = mpfs_clk_register_mssplls(dev, mpfs_msspll_clks, ARRAY_SIZE(mpfs_msspll_clks),
- clk_data);
+ ret = mpfs_clk_register_mssplls(dev, mpfs_msspll_clks, clk_data);
if (ret)
return ret;
>
> Update it to msspll_hw->id for accurate diagnostics
>
> Signed-off-by: Alok Tiwari <alok.a.tiwari@...cle.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs.c b/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs.c
> index c22632a7439c5..d12b7120f16ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs.c
> @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static int mpfs_clk_register_mssplls(struct device *dev, struct mpfs_msspll_hw_c
> ret = devm_clk_hw_register(dev, &msspll_hw->hw);
> if (ret)
> return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to register msspll id: %d\n",
> - CLK_MSSPLL_INTERNAL);
> + msspll_hw->id);
>
> data->hw_data.hws[msspll_hw->id] = &msspll_hw->hw;
> }
> --
> 2.46.0
>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists