[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aFwB-kkK6wM0y0QJ@google.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 07:04:42 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bp@...en8.de, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, Thomas.Lendacky@....com,
nikunj@....com, Santosh.Shukla@....com, Vasant.Hegde@....com,
Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com, David.Kaplan@....com, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, peterz@...radead.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, huibo.wang@....com, naveen.rao@....com,
francescolavra.fl@...il.com, tiala@...rosoft.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v7 14/37] KVM: x86: Move lapic set/clear_vector()
helpers to common code
Pick one scope for all of these. I.e. either "KVM: x86:" or "x86/apic: KVM:".
My vote is for "x86/apic: KVM:", because the "x86/apic" part helps communicate
where in common code the helpers are landing.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2025, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote:
> Move apic_clear_vector() and apic_set_vector() helper functions to
> apic.h in order to reuse them in the Secure AVIC guest apic driver
> in later patches to atomically set/clear vectors in the APIC backing
> page.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@....com>
> ---
Powered by blists - more mailing lists