lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1ada43bbb20b806975d6b0503e36a3b464287612.camel@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 16:05:34 +0100
From: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
  Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
 Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,  Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Linus Walleij
 <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski	 <brgl@...ev.pl>, Peter
 Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>, Will McVicker	
 <willmcvicker@...gle.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/17] dt-bindings: firmware: google,gs101-acpm-ipc:
 convert regulators to lowercase

Hi Krzysztof,

On Wed, 2025-06-11 at 10:08 +0100, André Draszik wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On Wed, 2025-06-11 at 11:04 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 04:02:57PM GMT, André Draszik wrote:
> > > Using lowercase for the buck and ldo nodenames is preferred, as
> > > evidenced e.g. in [1].
> > > 
> > > Convert the example here to lowercase before we add any bindings
> > > describing the s2mpg1x regulators that will enforce the spelling.
> > > 
> > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250223-mysterious-infrared-civet-e5bcbf@krzk-bin/ [1]
> > > Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/google,gs101-acpm-ipc.yaml | 4 ++--
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > So this is also a dependency for the rest of the patches?
> 
> My thinking was that it makes sense to have it in context with
> the other patches, but it indeed could go stand-alone if that's the
> preference.

Can you take just that patch as-is from this series (then it's at
least out of the way :-), or should I resend it separately?

Cheers,
Andre'

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ