[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250625190344.GA2023865-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 14:03:44 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>,
Will McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/17] dt-bindings: firmware: google,gs101-acpm-ipc:
convert regulators to lowercase
On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 04:05:34PM +0100, André Draszik wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On Wed, 2025-06-11 at 10:08 +0100, André Draszik wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > On Wed, 2025-06-11 at 11:04 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 04:02:57PM GMT, André Draszik wrote:
> > > > Using lowercase for the buck and ldo nodenames is preferred, as
> > > > evidenced e.g. in [1].
> > > >
> > > > Convert the example here to lowercase before we add any bindings
> > > > describing the s2mpg1x regulators that will enforce the spelling.
> > > >
> > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250223-mysterious-infrared-civet-e5bcbf@krzk-bin/ [1]
> > > > Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>
> > > > ---
> > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/google,gs101-acpm-ipc.yaml | 4 ++--
> > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > So this is also a dependency for the rest of the patches?
> >
> > My thinking was that it makes sense to have it in context with
> > the other patches, but it indeed could go stand-alone if that's the
> > preference.
>
> Can you take just that patch as-is from this series (then it's at
> least out of the way :-), or should I resend it separately?
No. If you take it out, then the rest of the series will have warnings.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists