[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4d54e4f6-0d98-4b42-9bea-169f3b8772bb@sabinyo.mountain>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 10:21:24 -0500
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: marc.herbert@...ux.intel.com
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Ben Cheatham <Benjamin.Cheatham@....com>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: faux: fix Undefined Behavior in
faux_device_destroy()
On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 07:15:56PM +0000, marc.herbert@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> gcc -O0: Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> gcc -O1: ptr is zero
> gcc -O2: ptr is NOT zero!!!
> gcc -O3: ptr is NOT zero!!!
> gcc -Og: ptr is zero
Btw, this is testing dereferences where the kernel code is doing pointer
math. No one disagrees about dereferences after a check.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists