[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1727c00a-b73d-436e-8ab6-c722c13c59fd@axiado.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 00:42:16 +0000
From: Harshit Shah <hshah@...ado.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski
<brgl@...ev.pl>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Catalin Marinas
<catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Jan Kotas
<jank@...ence.com>
CC: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, "soc@...ts.linux.dev" <soc@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] arm64: dts: axiado: Add initial support for AX3000
SoC and eval board
On 6/23/2025 11:45 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
>
>
> On 23/06/2025 19:28, Harshit Shah wrote:
>> + memory@0 {
>> + device_type = "memory";
>> + /* Cortex-A53 will use following memory map */
>> + reg = <0x00000000 0x3D000000 0x00000000 0x23000000>,
> Lowercase hex, see DTS coding style.
I missed it. I will update it to lower case.
>
>> + cpus {
>> + #address-cells = <2>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> + cpu0: cpu@0 {
>> + device_type = "cpu";
>> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x0>;
>> + enable-method = "spin-table";
>> + cpu-release-addr = <0x0 0x3c0013a0>;
>> + d-cache-size = <0x8000>;
>> + d-cache-line-size = <64>;
>> + d-cache-sets = <128>;
>> + i-cache-size = <0x8000>;
>> + i-cache-line-size = <64>;
>> + i-cache-sets = <256>;
>> + next-level-cache = <&l2>;
>> + };
> Missing blank line between each new node. See DTS coding style.
Noted, I will update between each nodes.
>
>> + cpu1: cpu@1 {
>> + device_type = "cpu";
>> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x1>;
>> + enable-method = "spin-table";
>> + cpu-release-addr = <0x0 0x3c0013a0>;
>> + d-cache-size = <0x8000>;
>> + d-cache-line-size = <64>;
>> + d-cache-sets = <128>;
>> + i-cache-size = <0x8000>;
>> + i-cache-line-size = <64>;
>> + i-cache-sets = <256>;
>> + next-level-cache = <&l2>;
>> + };
>> + cpu2: cpu@2 {
>> + device_type = "cpu";
>> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x2>;
>> + enable-method = "spin-table";
>> + cpu-release-addr = <0x0 0x3c0013a0>;
>> + d-cache-size = <0x8000>;
>> + d-cache-line-size = <64>;
>> + d-cache-sets = <128>;
>> + i-cache-size = <0x8000>;
>> + i-cache-line-size = <64>;
>> + i-cache-sets = <256>;
>> + next-level-cache = <&l2>;
>> + };
>> + cpu3: cpu@3 {
>> + device_type = "cpu";
>> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x3>;
>> + enable-method = "spin-table";
>> + cpu-release-addr = <0x0 0x3c0013a0>;
>> + d-cache-size = <0x8000>;
>> + d-cache-line-size = <64>;
>> + d-cache-sets = <128>;
>> + i-cache-size = <0x8000>;
>> + i-cache-line-size = <64>;
>> + i-cache-sets = <256>;
>> + next-level-cache = <&l2>;
>> + };
>> + l2: l2-cache0 {
>> + compatible = "cache";
>> + cache-size = <0x100000>;
>> + cache-unified;
>> + cache-line-size = <64>;
>> + cache-sets = <1024>;
>> + cache-level = <2>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + clocks {
>> + clk_xin: clock-200000000 {
>> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
>> + #clock-cells = <0>;
>> + clock-frequency = <200000000>;
>> + clock-output-names = "clk_xin";
>> + };
>> + refclk: clock-125000000 {
>> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
>> + #clock-cells = <0>;
>> + clock-frequency = <125000000>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + soc {
>> + compatible = "simple-bus";
>> + ranges;
>> + #address-cells = <2>;
>> + #size-cells = <2>;
>> + interrupt-parent = <&gic500>;
>> +
>> + gic500: interrupt-controller@...00000 {
>> + compatible = "arm,gic-v3";
>> + reg = <0x00 0x80300000 0x00 0x10000>,
>> + <0x00 0x80380000 0x00 0x80000>;
> Does not look aligned.
Agreed. I will update the alignment.
>
>> + ranges;
>> + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
>> + #address-cells = <2>;
>> + #size-cells = <2>;
>> + interrupt-controller;
>> + #redistributor-regions = <1>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 9 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + /* GPIO Controller banks 0 - 7 */
>> + gpio0: gpio-controller@...00000 {
>> + compatible = "cdns,gpio-r1p02";
>> + reg = <0x00 0x80500000 0x00 0x400>;
> Only one space, not double space.
Agreed. There is double space in every GPIO nodes, I will update the same.
Regards,
Harshit.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists