[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c704ea9a-8c73-46c2-80d1-f7b93a221908@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 10:57:47 -0700
From: Xin Li <xin@...or.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@...driver.com>,
Xin Li <xin3.li@...el.com>, "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@...nel.org>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Sneddon <daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>, Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>,
Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>,
Rick Edgecombe
<rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@...il.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Changbin Du <changbin.du@...wei.com>,
Huang Shijie <shijie@...amperecomputing.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 13/16] x86/traps: Handle LASS thrown #SS
On 6/25/2025 5:51 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> LASS throws a #GP for any violations except for stack register accesses,
> in which case it throws a #SS instead. Handle this similarly to how other
> LASS violations are handled.
>
> In case of FRED, before handling #SS as LASS violation, kernel has to
> check if there's a fixup for the exception. It can address #SS due to
> invalid user context on ERETU[1]. See 5105e7687ad3 ("x86/fred: Fixup
Forgot to put the link to [1]? Maybe just remove "[1]"?
> fault on ERETU by jumping to fred_entrypoint_user") for more details.
>
> Co-developed-by: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/traps.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> index e2ad760b17ea..f1f92e1ba524 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -418,12 +418,6 @@ DEFINE_IDTENTRY_ERRORCODE(exc_segment_not_present)
> SIGBUS, 0, NULL);
> }
>
> -DEFINE_IDTENTRY_ERRORCODE(exc_stack_segment)
> -{
> - do_error_trap(regs, error_code, "stack segment", X86_TRAP_SS, SIGBUS,
> - 0, NULL);
> -}
> -
> DEFINE_IDTENTRY_ERRORCODE(exc_alignment_check)
> {
> char *str = "alignment check";
> @@ -866,6 +860,39 @@ DEFINE_IDTENTRY_ERRORCODE(exc_general_protection)
> cond_local_irq_disable(regs);
> }
>
> +#define SSFSTR "stack segment fault"
> +
> +DEFINE_IDTENTRY_ERRORCODE(exc_stack_segment)
> +{
> + if (user_mode(regs))
> + goto error_trap;
> +
> + if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_FRED) &&
> + fixup_exception(regs, X86_TRAP_SS, error_code, 0))
> + return;
> +
Thanks for making the change for FRED.
> + if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_LASS)) {
> + enum kernel_gp_hint hint;
> + unsigned long gp_addr;
> +
> + hint = get_kernel_gp_address(regs, &gp_addr);
> + if (hint != GP_NO_HINT) {
> + printk(SSFSTR ", %s 0x%lx", kernel_gp_hint_help[hint],
> + gp_addr);
> + }
> +
> + if (hint != GP_NON_CANONICAL)
> + gp_addr = 0;
Nit: GP/gp don't seem fit here, maybe we need a more generic name?
Sorry I don't have a recommendation.
> +
> + die_addr(SSFSTR, regs, error_code, gp_addr);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> +error_trap:
> + do_error_trap(regs, error_code, "stack segment", X86_TRAP_SS, SIGBUS,
> + 0, NULL);
The indentation has changed; I believe the original formatting is
preferable.
> +}
> +
> static bool do_int3(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> int res;
Just minor comments, so
Reviewed-by: Xin Li (Intel) <xin@...or.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists