lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <gqoba4uu62sh4qxapqkhlufxnliatevnsqcxvijvb74tposf2b@iyonh347aext>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 14:08:23 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Steev Klimaszewski <steev@...i.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] firmware: qcom: scm: add modparam to control
 QSEECOM enablement

On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 12:11:20PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 01:53:25AM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> > 
> > In preparation to enabling QSEECOM for the platforms rather than
> > individual machines provide a mechanism for the user to override default
> > selection. Allow users to use qcom_scm.qseecom modparam.
> > 
> > Setting it to 'force' will enable QSEECOM even if it disabled or not
> > handled by the allowlist.
> > 
> > Setting it to 'off' will forcibly disable the QSEECOM interface,
> > allowing incompatible machines to function.
> > 
> > Setting it to 'roefivars' will enable the QSEECOM interface, making UEFI
> > variables read-only.
> > 
> > All other values mean 'auto', trusting the allowlist in the module.
> 
> I don't see the need for this. The kernel should just provide sensible
> defaults.

It does provide _defaults_. However with the next commit we mass-enable
QSEECOM for SoC families, which includes untested WoA devices. If the
user observes a misbehaviour of the UEFI vars or any other
QSEECOM-related driver on those platforms, it is much easier to let
users test and workaround UEFI misbehaviour.

I can probably add an explicit message that if the modparam is used, it
must be reported to linux-arm-msm@.

> 
> Johan

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ