[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <175093628786.4005407.10292502794888309807@ping.linuxembedded.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 12:11:27 +0100
From: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>
To: "Nirujogi, Pratap" <pnirujog@....com>, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Hao Yao <hao.yao@...el.com>, Pratap Nirujogi <pratap.nirujogi@....com>, mchehab@...nel.org, hverkuil@...all.nl, bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org, krzk@...nel.org, dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com, hdegoede@...hat.com, jai.luthra@...asonboard.com, tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com, linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, benjamin.chan@....com, bin.du@....com, grosikop@....com, king.li@....com, dantony@....com, vengutta@....com, dongcheng.yan@...el.com, jason.z.chen@...el.com, jimmy.su@...el.com, Svetoslav.Stoilov@....com, Yana.Zheleva@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 RESEND] media: i2c: Add OV05C10 camera sensor driver
Quoting Nirujogi, Pratap (2025-06-25 23:06:01)
> Hi Sakari, Hi Laurent,
>
> On 6/23/2025 5:55 PM, Nirujogi, Pratap wrote:
> [...]
> >>>> I think it can live in the driver for now. Given that the device uses
> >>>> only 8 bits of register address, I would store the page number in bits
> >>>> 15:8 instead of bits 31:24, as the CCI helpers do not make bits 27:24
> >>>> available for driver-specific purpose.
> >>>
> >>> I'd use the CCI private bits, the driver uses page numbers up to 4 so 4
> >>> bits are plenty for that. If we add pages to CCI later, this may be
> >>> refactored then.
> >>
> >> That works too.
> >>
> > Thanks for your support. We will add the page number in the register
> > address 15:8 or 11:8 and will update the implementation accordingly in
> > the next version.
> >
> I would like to share the approach we are taking to implement the CCI
> helpers that support page value. Could you please review the steps and
> let us know if they make sense or if any adjustments are needed?
>
> 1: Add new macros to embed page value into the register address.
>
> Ex:
> #define CCI_PAGE_REG8(x, p) ((1 << CCI_REG_WIDTH_SHIFT) | (p <<
> CCI_REG_PRIVATE_SHIFT) | (x))
> #define CCI_PAGE_REG16(x, p) ((2 << CCI_REG_WIDTH_SHIFT) | (p <<
> CCI_REG_PRIVATE_SHIFT) | (x))
>
> 2: Create V4L2 CCI context. Initialize page control reg, current_page,
> regmap etc.
>
> Ex:
> struct v4l2_cci_ctx {
> struct mutex lock;
> struct regmap *map;
> s16 current_page;
> u8 page_ctrl_reg;
> }
>
> 3: Introduce new CCI helpers - cci_pwrite() and cci_pread() to handle
> register read-writes updating the page control register as necessary.
Out of curiosity - but couldn't the existing cci_write and cci_read
already be used by the users - and then the default behaviour is that
the page isn't modified if there is no page_ctrl_reg - and by default
CCI_REG() will simply have (initilised) as page 0 - so the pages will
never change on those calls?
Then the users can indeed define
#define TEST_PATTERN_PAGE 5
#define TEST_PATTERN_COLOUR_BARS BIT(3)
#define MY_TEST_PATTERN_REG CCI_PAGE_REG8(0x33, TEST_PATTERN_PAGE)
and can call
cci_write(regmap, MY_TEST_PATTERN_REG, TEST_PATTERN_COLOUR_BARS, &ret);
with everything handled transparently ?
Or do you envisage more complications with the types of pages that might
be supportable ?
(I perfectly understand if I'm wishing for an unreachable utopia -
because I haven't considered something implicit about the page handling
that I haven't yet used :D)
--
Kieran
> int cci_pwrite(void *data, u32 reg, u64 val, int *err)
> {
> /* get v4l2_cci_ctx context from data */
>
> /* get page value from reg */
>
> /* acquire mutex */
>
> /* update cci page control reg, save current page value */
>
> /* do cci_write */
>
> /* release mutex */
> }
>
> Similar steps for cci_pread() as well.
>
> Thanks,
> Pratap
Powered by blists - more mailing lists