[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250627112429.00007155@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 11:24:29 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>
CC: <dave@...olabs.net>, <dave.jiang@...el.com>, <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
<dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, <shiju.jose@...wei.com>,
<ming.li@...omail.com>, <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>,
<rrichter@....com>, <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
<PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@....com>, <lukas@...ner.de>,
<Benjamin.Cheatham@....com>, <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
<linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 05/17] CXL/AER: Introduce kfifo for forwarding CXL
errors
On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:42:40 -0500
Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com> wrote:
> CXL error handling will soon be moved from the AER driver into the CXL
> driver. This requires a notification mechanism for the AER driver to share
> the AER interrupt with the CXL driver. The notification will be used
> as an indication for the CXL drivers to handle and log the CXL RAS errors.
>
> First, introduce cxl/core/native_ras.c to contain changes for the CXL
> driver's RAS native handling. This as an alternative to dropping the
> changes into existing cxl/core/ras.c file with purpose to avoid #ifdefs.
> Introduce CXL Kconfig CXL_NATIVE_RAS, dependent on PCIEAER_CXL, to
> conditionally compile the new file.
>
> Add a kfifo work queue to be used by the AER driver and CXL driver. The AER
> driver will be the sole kfifo producer adding work and the cxl_core will be
> the sole kfifo consumer removing work. Add the boilerplate kfifo support.
>
> Add CXL work queue handler registration functions in the AER driver. Export
> the functions allowing CXL driver to access. Implement registration
> functions for the CXL driver to assign or clear the work handler function.
>
> Introduce 'struct cxl_proto_err_info' to serve as the kfifo work data. This
> will contain the erring device's PCI SBDF details used to rediscover the
> device after the CXL driver dequeues the kfifo work. The device rediscovery
> will be introduced along with the CXL handling in future patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>
Hi Terry,
Whilst it obviously makes patch preparation a bit more time consuming
for series like this with many patches it can be useful to add a brief
change log to the individual patches as well as the cover letter.
That helps reviewers figure out where they need to look again.
A few trivial things inline.
With those fixed up
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/cxl/Kconfig | 14 ++++++++
> drivers/cxl/core/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/cxl/core/core.h | 8 +++++
> drivers/cxl/core/native_ras.c | 26 +++++++++++++++
> drivers/cxl/core/port.c | 2 ++
> drivers/cxl/core/ras.c | 1 +
> drivers/cxl/cxlpci.h | 1 +
> drivers/pci/pci.h | 4 +++
> drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 7 ++--
> drivers/pci/pcie/cxl_aer.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/aer.h | 31 ++++++++++++++++++
> 11 files changed, 153 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/cxl/core/native_ras.c
> static void cxl_cper_trace_corr_port_prot_err(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxlpci.h b/drivers/cxl/cxlpci.h
> index 54e219b0049e..6f1396ef7b77 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxlpci.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxlpci.h
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> #define __CXL_PCI_H__
> #include <linux/pci.h>
> #include "cxl.h"
> +#include "linux/aer.h"
Why? There are no changes in this header other than the include and the changes
to linux/aer.h are new stuff so I can't see how it becomes necessary if it
wasn't before.
Might well have always been missing and should have been here. If so separate
patch to tidy that up.
>
> #define CXL_MEMORY_PROGIF 0x10
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/cxl_aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/cxl_aer.c
> index b2ea14f70055..846ab55d747c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/cxl_aer.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/cxl_aer.c
> static int cxl_rch_handle_error_iter(struct pci_dev *dev, void *data)
> {
> struct aer_err_info *info = (struct aer_err_info *)data;
> @@ -136,3 +152,47 @@ void cxl_rch_enable_rcec(struct pci_dev *rcec)
> pci_info(rcec, "CXL: Internal errors unmasked");
> }
>
> +static DEFINE_KFIFO(cxl_proto_err_fifo, struct cxl_proto_err_work_data,
> + CXL_ERROR_SOURCES_MAX);
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(cxl_proto_err_fifo_lock);
> +struct work_struct *cxl_proto_err_work;
I'm not seeing a declaration for this in the headers, so can it be static?
This is made a little more confusing as in this patch we have both
a structure called cxl_proto_err_work and a pointer to it with exactly the
same name. Maybe rename this so it's subtly different. cxl_protocol_err_work
or something silly like that just to make reviewers life a tiny bit easier!
> +
> diff --git a/include/linux/aer.h b/include/linux/aer.h
> index 02940be66324..24c3d9e18ad5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/aer.h
> +++ b/include/linux/aer.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/errno.h>
> #include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/workqueue_types.h>
>
> #define AER_NONFATAL 0
> #define AER_FATAL 1
> @@ -53,6 +54,26 @@ struct aer_capability_regs {
> u16 uncor_err_source;
> };
>
> +/**
> + * struct cxl_proto_err_info - Error information used in CXL error handling
> + * @severity: AER severity
> + * @function: Device's PCI function
Run kernel-doc over the files and fix errors / warning.
Missed updating this to devfn which it would have shouted about.
> + * @device: Device's PCI device
> + * @bus: Device's PCI bus
> + * @segment: Device's PCI segment
> + */
> +struct cxl_proto_error_info {
> + int severity;
> +
> + u8 devfn;
> + u8 bus;
> + u16 segment;
> +};
Powered by blists - more mailing lists