linux-kernel - RE:[PATCH] scsi: fix out of bounds error in /drivers/scsi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tencent_12DB60FFE724D17784666194FAB42BDC9A07@qq.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 16:21:49 +0800
From: jackysliu <1972843537@...com>
To: 1972843537@...com
Cc: James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com,
	bvanassche@....org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	martin.petersen@...cle.com
Subject: RE:[PATCH] scsi: fix out of bounds error in /drivers/scsi

On 6/18/25 08:26 AM , Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> Can I know what kind of impact this vulnerability will have?
>
>The worst possible impact I see is that the Linux kernel would decide 
>that RSCS is supported although the device doesn't support it. This
>could cause sd_read_io_hints() to print incorrect information. The
>following message could be printed when it should not be printed:
>"Unexpected: RSCS has been set and the permanent stream count is %u\n"
>
>> And is it possible to get a cve number?
>
>You are asking the wrong person. I don't know how to get a CVE number.
>
>Bart.

Thank you Bart,for the patient review. I've submitted a new patch which 
mentioned way of detection and influenced stable tags.
Best regards.

Jackysliu