[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tencent_88DDBC2334BBA2C8A4C1E122DE62F8AB250A@qq.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 15:56:17 +0800
From: jackysliu <1972843537@...com>
To: 1972843537@...com
Cc: James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com,
bvanassche@....org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
martin.petersen@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: gadget: functioni: Fix a oob problem in rndis
On Fri, Jul 11 2025 08:51:30 +0200, greg k-h wrote:
>Yes, and then look to see what buf_len (not buflen) in
>gen_ndis_set_resp() is used for. I'll wait... :)
Oh,my bad.It seem that buf_len will only be used for some debugging code..
>What tool generated this static analysis? You always have to mention
>that as per our development rules.
The vulnerability is found by is found by Wukong-Agent, a code security AI agent,
through static code analysis.But It seems that this is a false positive..
And what qemu setup did you use to test this? That would be helpful to
know so that I can verify it on my end.
I'll add some web-usb device to test this model.But seems that I went into a wrong way.
Thanks
Siyang Liu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists