linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] EDAC: mem_repair: reduce stack usage in edac_mem_repair_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ff6cdc5223664c53a269a5c259c156bd@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 12:29:24 +0000
From: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@...wei.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Tony Luck
	<tony.luck@...el.com>
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>, "Mauro
 Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@...nel.org>, Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
	"Dave Jiang" <dave.jiang@...el.com>, Alison Schofield
	<alison.schofield@...el.com>, "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] EDAC: mem_repair: reduce stack usage in
 edac_mem_repair_get_desc()

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
>Sent: 20 June 2025 12:41
>To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>; Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>; Shiju
>Jose <shiju.jose@...wei.com>
>Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>; James Morse <james.morse@....com>;
>Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>; Robert Richter
><rric@...nel.org>; Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>; Alison Schofield
><alison.schofield@...el.com>; linux-edac@...r.kernel.org; linux-
>kernel@...r.kernel.org
>Subject: [PATCH] EDAC: mem_repair: reduce stack usage in
>edac_mem_repair_get_desc()
>
>From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
>Constructing an array on the stack adds complexity and can exceed the warning
>limit for per-function stack usage:
>
>drivers/edac/mem_repair.c:361:5: error: stack frame size (1296) exceeds limit
>(1280) in 'edac_mem_repair_get_desc' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than]
>
>Change this to have the actual attribute array allocated statically and then just
>add the instance number on the per-instance copy.
>
>Fixes: 699ea5219c4b ("EDAC: Add a memory repair control feature")
>Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Sorry, I missed this patch.
Tested-by: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@...wei.com>
>---
> drivers/edac/mem_repair.c | 56 +++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/edac/mem_repair.c b/drivers/edac/mem_repair.c index
>d1a8caa85369..2e4e790e0ffe 100755
>--- a/drivers/edac/mem_repair.c
>+++ b/drivers/edac/mem_repair.c
>@@ -286,17 +286,26 @@ static umode_t mem_repair_attr_visible(struct
>kobject *kobj, struct attribute *a
> 	return 0;
> }
>
>-#define MR_ATTR_RO(_name, _instance)       \
>-	((struct edac_mem_repair_dev_attr) { .dev_attr = __ATTR_RO(_name),
>\
>-					     .instance = _instance })
>-
>-#define MR_ATTR_WO(_name, _instance)       \
>-	((struct edac_mem_repair_dev_attr) { .dev_attr = __ATTR_WO(_name),
>\
>-					     .instance = _instance })
>-
>-#define MR_ATTR_RW(_name, _instance)       \
>-	((struct edac_mem_repair_dev_attr) { .dev_attr = __ATTR_RW(_name),
>\
>-					     .instance = _instance })
>+static const struct device_attribute mem_repair_dev_attr[] = {
>+	[MR_TYPE]	  = __ATTR_RO(repair_type),
>+	[MR_PERSIST_MODE] = __ATTR_RW(persist_mode),
>+	[MR_SAFE_IN_USE]  = __ATTR_RO(repair_safe_when_in_use),
>+	[MR_HPA]	  = __ATTR_RW(hpa),
>+	[MR_MIN_HPA]	  = __ATTR_RO(min_hpa),
>+	[MR_MAX_HPA]	  = __ATTR_RO(max_hpa),
>+	[MR_DPA]	  = __ATTR_RW(dpa),
>+	[MR_MIN_DPA]	  = __ATTR_RO(min_dpa),
>+	[MR_MAX_DPA]	  = __ATTR_RO(max_dpa),
>+	[MR_NIBBLE_MASK]  = __ATTR_RW(nibble_mask),
>+	[MR_BANK_GROUP]   = __ATTR_RW(bank_group),
>+	[MR_BANK]	  = __ATTR_RW(bank),
>+	[MR_RANK]	  = __ATTR_RW(rank),
>+	[MR_ROW]	  = __ATTR_RW(row),
>+	[MR_COLUMN]	  = __ATTR_RW(column),
>+	[MR_CHANNEL]	  = __ATTR_RW(channel),
>+	[MR_SUB_CHANNEL]  = __ATTR_RW(sub_channel),
>+	[MEM_DO_REPAIR]	  = __ATTR_WO(repair)
>+};
>
> static int mem_repair_create_desc(struct device *dev,
> 				  const struct attribute_group **attr_groups,
>@@ -305,34 +314,13 @@ static int mem_repair_create_desc(struct device
>*dev,
> 	struct edac_mem_repair_context *ctx;
> 	struct attribute_group *group;
> 	int i;
>-	struct edac_mem_repair_dev_attr dev_attr[] = {
>-		[MR_TYPE]	  = MR_ATTR_RO(repair_type, instance),
>-		[MR_PERSIST_MODE] = MR_ATTR_RW(persist_mode, instance),
>-		[MR_SAFE_IN_USE]  = MR_ATTR_RO(repair_safe_when_in_use,
>instance),
>-		[MR_HPA]	  = MR_ATTR_RW(hpa, instance),
>-		[MR_MIN_HPA]	  = MR_ATTR_RO(min_hpa, instance),
>-		[MR_MAX_HPA]	  = MR_ATTR_RO(max_hpa, instance),
>-		[MR_DPA]	  = MR_ATTR_RW(dpa, instance),
>-		[MR_MIN_DPA]	  = MR_ATTR_RO(min_dpa, instance),
>-		[MR_MAX_DPA]	  = MR_ATTR_RO(max_dpa, instance),
>-		[MR_NIBBLE_MASK]  = MR_ATTR_RW(nibble_mask, instance),
>-		[MR_BANK_GROUP]   = MR_ATTR_RW(bank_group, instance),
>-		[MR_BANK]	  = MR_ATTR_RW(bank, instance),
>-		[MR_RANK]	  = MR_ATTR_RW(rank, instance),
>-		[MR_ROW]	  = MR_ATTR_RW(row, instance),
>-		[MR_COLUMN]	  = MR_ATTR_RW(column, instance),
>-		[MR_CHANNEL]	  = MR_ATTR_RW(channel, instance),
>-		[MR_SUB_CHANNEL]  = MR_ATTR_RW(sub_channel, instance),
>-		[MEM_DO_REPAIR]	  = MR_ATTR_WO(repair, instance)
>-	};
>-
> 	ctx = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
> 	if (!ctx)
> 		return -ENOMEM;
>
> 	for (i = 0; i < MR_MAX_ATTRS; i++) {
>-		memcpy(&ctx->mem_repair_dev_attr[i],
>-		       &dev_attr[i], sizeof(dev_attr[i]));
>+		ctx->mem_repair_dev_attr[i].dev_attr =
>mem_repair_dev_attr[i];
>+		ctx->mem_repair_dev_attr[i].instance = instance;
> 		ctx->mem_repair_attrs[i] =
> 			&ctx->mem_repair_dev_attr[i].dev_attr.attr;
> 	}
>--
>2.39.5
>