[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aGPuue3_-BSPffR0@kbusch-mbp>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 10:20:41 -0400
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
To: Ben Copeland <ben.copeland@...aro.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, regressions@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, axboe@...nel.dk,
sagi@...mberg.me, iommu@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: next-20250627: IOMMU DMA warning during NVMe I/O completion
after 06cae0e3f61c
On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 02:05:04PM +0100, Ben Copeland wrote:
> Even though SGLs are not supported, I gave you the patch a spin and
> saw the same stack traces.
Right, that patch applies only if SGL is not supported, but it's only
fixing part of the problem, so I expected it would still fail.
The dma teardown needs to be symetric to the dma mapping, but we've
removed the sg-table now, so we don't have the original mapping context
in the completion path here. Christoph replied with a patch that tries
to infer it based on the dma_addr continuity, which I think should work
for you, but I'll have to look a bit closer to be confident it's always
the correct assumption.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists