lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ecuz51eg.fsf@igalia.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2025 17:19:51 +0100
From: Luis Henriques <luis@...lia.com>
To: "Achill Gilgenast" <fossdd@...ed.life>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,  "Greg Kroah-Hartman"
 <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,  "Linus Torvalds"
 <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,  "Shuah Khan"
 <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,  <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
  <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,  <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] kallsyms: fix build without execinfo

On Tue, Jul 01 2025, Achill Gilgenast wrote:

> On Mon Jun 23, 2025 at 1:53 PM CEST, Achill Gilgenast wrote:
>> On Sun Jun 22, 2025 at 8:36 PM CEST, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> On Sun, 22 Jun 2025 03:45:49 +0200 Achill Gilgenast <fossdd@...ed.life> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Some libc's like musl libc don't provide execinfo.h since it's not part
>>>> of POSIX. In order to fix compilation on musl, only include execinfo.h
>>>> if available (HAVE_BACKTRACE_SUPPORT)
>>>> 
>>>> This was discovered with c104c16073b7 ("Kunit to check the longest symbol length")
>>>> which starts to include linux/kallsyms.h with Alpine Linux' configs.
>>>> 
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> --- a/tools/include/linux/kallsyms.h
>>>> +++ b/tools/include/linux/kallsyms.h
>>>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ static inline const char *kallsyms_lookup(unsigned long addr,
>>>>  	return NULL;
>>>>  }
>>>>  
>>>> +#ifdef HAVE_BACKTRACE_SUPPORT
>>>>  #include <execinfo.h>
>>>>  #include <stdlib.h>
>>>>  static inline void print_ip_sym(const char *loglvl, unsigned long ip)
>>>
>>> I'm not seeing anything in there which needs execinfo.h.  Can we simply
>>> remove the inclusion?
>>
>> No, since backtrace_symbols is provided by execinfo.h.
>
> Is there some status on it? I saw you picked it in mm-hotfixes-unstable,
> but it got dropped out again.
>
> Is there something I can do to push it?

FWIW I can confirm this is indeed a regression.  And specially annoying
because it has been backported into stable kernels (even if having kunit
tests backported sounds odd to me).

It would be great to have this fixed, or reverted.

Cheers,
-- 
Luís

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ