[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250701120920.49cd122526b3032a4db1e218@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 12:09:20 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Luis Henriques <luis@...lia.com>
Cc: "Achill Gilgenast" <fossdd@...ed.life>, "Greg Kroah-Hartman"
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Linus Torvalds"
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, "Shuah Khan" <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] kallsyms: fix build without execinfo
On Tue, 01 Jul 2025 17:19:51 +0100 Luis Henriques <luis@...lia.com> wrote:
> >> No, since backtrace_symbols is provided by execinfo.h.
> >
> > Is there some status on it? I saw you picked it in mm-hotfixes-unstable,
> > but it got dropped out again.
> >
> > Is there something I can do to push it?
>
> FWIW I can confirm this is indeed a regression. And specially annoying
> because it has been backported into stable kernels (even if having kunit
> tests backported sounds odd to me).
>
> It would be great to have this fixed, or reverted.
OK, thanks for the reminder, I restored this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists