linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] rust: revocable: documentation and refactorings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPZ3m_hRQGQKYhS+Vw5EQiYOfy4iDKH-0xaqWrEcMTyj2c_WAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 09:40:32 -0300
From: Marcelo Moreira <marcelomoreira1905@...il.com>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
Cc: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lossin@...nel.org, ojeda@...nel.org, 
	skhan@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org, 
	~lkcamp/patches@...ts.sr.ht
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] rust: revocable: documentation and refactorings

Em ter., 1 de jul. de 2025 às 08:40, Danilo Krummrich
<dakr@...nel.org> escreveu:
>
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 01:27:17PM +0200, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 6:59 PM Marcelo Moreira
> > <marcelomoreira1905@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > This patch series brings documentation and refactorings to the `Revocable` type.
> > >
> > > Changes include:
> > > - Clarifying the write invariant and updating associated safety comments for `Revocable<T>`.
> > > - Splitting the internal `revoke_internal` function into two distinct, explicit functions: `revoke()` (safe, synchronizing with RCU) and `revoke_nosync()` (unsafe, without RCU synchronization), now returning `bool` to indicate revocation status.
> > >
> > > Marcelo Moreira (2):
> > >   rust: revocable: Refactor revocation mechanism to remove generic
> > >     revoke_internal
> > >   rust: revocable: Clarify write invariant and update safety comments
> >
> > Danilo, did you have Revocable / Devres changes that conflict with this?
>
> Yes, but I sent them to Linus for -rc3 already. Given that rust-next is based on
> -rc3, we should be good. There shouldn't be any further conflicts.

Hi guys!

I resolved the conflicts. I hope it is the way you expected.

-- 
Cheers,
Marcelo Moreira