[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <09770a46-3d66-4256-a4b1-39d468daca65@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 17:39:20 +0300
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, Dave Hansen
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>, <seanjc@...gle.com>,
<vannapurve@...gle.com>
CC: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, "Thomas
Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
<x86@...nel.org>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
<kai.huang@...el.com>, <reinette.chatre@...el.com>, <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>,
<tony.lindgren@...ux.intel.com>, <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>,
<isaku.yamahata@...el.com>, <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>, <chao.gao@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/tdx: Eliminate duplicate code in tdx_clear_page()
On 03/07/2025 17:14, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 7/3/25 04:40, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> tdx_clear_page() and reset_tdx_pages() duplicate the TDX page clearing
>> logic. Keep the tdx_clear_page() prototype but call reset_tdx_pages() for
>> the implementation.
>
> Why keep the old prototype?
What prototype would you prefer?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists