[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <af0da28c-3ca0-41dc-aaa4-572723ea74bf@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 21:28:12 +0100
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>,
Dikshita Agarwal <quic_dikshita@...cinc.com>,
Abhinav Kumar <abhinav.kumar@...ux.dev>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Introduce "non-pixel" sub node within iris video
node
On 03/07/2025 16:28, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> Back to the point, I actually think what this patchset does is
> resonable, especially given the address range and SMMU SID requirements
> that the OS*must* be aware of (or the device will crash after a
> translation fault / security violation).
I still give my RB for the series.
To me the only question is should it be applied to sm8550 or to new SoCs
from now on, sa8775p, x1e and derivatives.
I take the point on ABI breakage on 8550, so to me it seems fully
consistent with Krzysztof's statements on ABI maintenance and indeed the
need to expand the features of this driver to do so from the next
submission onwards.
That can be as simple as
schema.yaml
if compatible newsoc
minItems:1
maxItems:2
8550's ABI is stable and new SoC submissions will support the
secure/non-pixel method.
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists