[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250704152449.12156-1-abd.masalkhi@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 15:24:49 +0000
From: Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi <abd.masalkhi@...il.com>
To: krzk@...nel.org
Cc: abd.masalkhi@...il.com,
arnd@...db.de,
conor+dt@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
luoyifan@...s.chinamobile.com,
robh@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] dt-bindings: eeprom: Add ST M24LR support
On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 17:10:07 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 04/07/2025 14:39, Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi wrote:
> > Add support for STMicroelectronics M24LR RFID/NFC EEPROM chips.
> > These devices use two I2C addresses: the primary address provides
> > access to control and system parameter registers, while the
> > secondary address is used for EEPROM access.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi <abd.masalkhi@...il.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v5:
> > - No changes and already reviewed by Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > - Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250608182714.3359441-2-abd.masalkhi@gmail.com/
>
> So you just ignore the tag?
>
> <form letter>
> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>
> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
>
> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions
> of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed
> significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is
> "received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing
> list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost
> patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for
> tags received on the version they apply.
>
> Please read:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
>
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> </form letter>
Hi Krzysztof,
Thank you for the clear explanation. I wasn't aware of the process,
I will make sure to include the tags properly in future versions.
Best regards,
Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists