linux-kernel - Re: [RFC V2 18/18] famfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aGgkVA81Zms8Xgel@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 19:58:28 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, John Groves <John@...ves.net>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redb.hu>,
	Bernd Schubert <bschubert@....com>,
	John Groves <jgroves@...ron.com>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
	"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <shajnocz@...hat.com>,
	Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@...il.com>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
	Aravind Ramesh <arramesh@...ron.com>,
	Ajay Joshi <ajayjoshi@...ron.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC V2 18/18] famfs_fuse: Add documentation

On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 10:53:23AM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 08:22:58PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > Bagas.  Stop.
> > 
> > John has written documentation, that is great.  Do not add needless
> > friction to this process.  Seriously.
> > 
> > Why do I have to keep telling you this?
> 
> Cause I'm more of perfectionist (detail-oriented)...

Reviews aren't about you.  They're about producing a better patch.
Do your reviews produce better patches or do they make the perfect the
enemy of the good?