lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aGhjv37uw3w4nZ2C@archie.me>
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2025 06:29:03 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, John Groves <John@...ves.net>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redb.hu>,
	Bernd Schubert <bschubert@....com>,
	John Groves <jgroves@...ron.com>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
	"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <shajnocz@...hat.com>,
	Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@...il.com>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
	Aravind Ramesh <arramesh@...ron.com>,
	Ajay Joshi <ajayjoshi@...ron.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC V2 18/18] famfs_fuse: Add documentation

On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 07:58:28PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 10:53:23AM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 08:22:58PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > > Bagas.  Stop.
> > > 
> > > John has written documentation, that is great.  Do not add needless
> > > friction to this process.  Seriously.
> > > 
> > > Why do I have to keep telling you this?
> > 
> > Cause I'm more of perfectionist (detail-oriented)...
> 
> Reviews aren't about you.  They're about producing a better patch.
> Do your reviews produce better patches or do they make the perfect the
> enemy of the good?

I'm looking for any Sphinx warnings, but if there's none, I check for
better wording or improving the docs output.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ