[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aGhlckJrNJE1Au10@archie.me>
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2025 06:36:18 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>, John Groves <John@...ves.net>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Bernd Schubert <bschubert@....com>,
John Groves <jgroves@...ron.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <shajnocz@...hat.com>,
Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@...il.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
Aravind Ramesh <arramesh@...ron.com>,
Ajay Joshi <ajayjoshi@...ron.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Subject: Re: [RFC V2 18/18] famfs_fuse: Add documentation
On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 10:27:03AM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 8:51 PM John Groves <John@...ves.net> wrote:
> >
> > Add Documentation/filesystems/famfs.rst and update MAINTAINERS
> >
> > Signed-off-by: John Groves <john@...ves.net>
> > ---
> > Documentation/filesystems/famfs.rst | 142 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > Documentation/filesystems/index.rst | 1 +
> > MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> > 3 files changed, 144 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/filesystems/famfs.rst
>
>
> Considering "Documentation: fuse: Consolidate FUSE docs into its own
> subdirectory"
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20250612032239.17561-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com/
>
> I wonder if famfs and virtiofs should be moved into fuse subdir?
> To me it makes more sense, but it's not a clear cut.
>
I guess these can stay in their place as-is for now. However, if we later have
more fuse-based filesystems (at least 3 or 4), placing them in
Documentation/filesystems/fuse-based might make sense (fuse subdir documents
fuse framework itself, though).
Thanks.
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists