[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aGeCx5zHUPKtaryg@google.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 07:29:11 +0000
From: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
Cc: Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/6] rust: irq: add support for non-threaded IRQs and handlers
On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 08:49:07PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On 7/3/25 7:12 PM, Daniel Almeida wrote:
> > > +/// Callbacks for an IRQ handler.
> > > +pub trait Handler: Sync {
> >
> > I wonder if we should require ’static here too?
> >
> > Same for the Threaded trait.
>
> You already have
>
> impl<T: Handler + 'static> Registration<T>
>
> which I think this is good enough.
If we're not going to support non-static handlers, then I think it's
simpler to place the 'static bound on the trait.
Alice
Powered by blists - more mailing lists