[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <226fd16c-8071-43c7-9ecc-9bd95e319aaf@lucaweiss.eu>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2025 10:31:38 +0200
From: Luca Weiss <luca@...aweiss.eu>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_pas: Use resource with CX PD
for MSM8974
On 05-07-2025 10:57 p.m., Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2025 at 03:19:57PM +0200, Luca Weiss wrote:
>> MSM8974 requires the CX power domain, so use the msm8996_adsp_resource
>> which has cx under proxy_pd_names and is otherwise equivalent.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@...aweiss.eu>
>> ---
>> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Hmm. You are modifying the ADSP configuration in the driver, but at the
> same time you've dropped CX supply from the MSS remoteproc.
The qcom_q6v5_mss driver has this support for .fallback_proxy_supply,
which are used in case the power domain is not specified.
So no driver change is necessary in the mss driver for both old and new
devicetrees, but the adsp driver does not have this fallback, so that's
why the adsp config is updated.
Does that make it clear?
Regards
Luca
Powered by blists - more mailing lists