lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <226fd16c-8071-43c7-9ecc-9bd95e319aaf@lucaweiss.eu>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2025 10:31:38 +0200
From: Luca Weiss <luca@...aweiss.eu>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
 Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_pas: Use resource with CX PD
 for MSM8974

On 05-07-2025 10:57 p.m., Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2025 at 03:19:57PM +0200, Luca Weiss wrote:
>> MSM8974 requires the CX power domain, so use the msm8996_adsp_resource
>> which has cx under proxy_pd_names and is otherwise equivalent.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@...aweiss.eu>
>> ---
>>   drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Hmm. You are modifying the ADSP configuration in the driver, but at the
> same time you've dropped CX supply from the MSS remoteproc.

The qcom_q6v5_mss driver has this support for .fallback_proxy_supply, 
which are used in case the power domain is not specified.

So no driver change is necessary in the mss driver for both old and new 
devicetrees, but the adsp driver does not have this fallback, so that's 
why the adsp config is updated.

Does that make it clear?

Regards
Luca

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ