linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_pas: Use resource with CX PD for MSM8974

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <znv7ish4ufkgnzfwyxjt2ercdvemxh644zwpqthj7rtf5gb4fe@auvbeemdlbtk>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2025 13:08:12 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Luca Weiss <luca@...aweiss.eu>
Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_pas: Use resource with CX PD
 for MSM8974

On Sun, Jul 06, 2025 at 10:31:38AM +0200, Luca Weiss wrote:
> On 05-07-2025 10:57 p.m., Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 21, 2025 at 03:19:57PM +0200, Luca Weiss wrote:
> > > MSM8974 requires the CX power domain, so use the msm8996_adsp_resource
> > > which has cx under proxy_pd_names and is otherwise equivalent.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@...aweiss.eu>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c | 2 +-
> > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > Hmm. You are modifying the ADSP configuration in the driver, but at the
> > same time you've dropped CX supply from the MSS remoteproc.
> 
> The qcom_q6v5_mss driver has this support for .fallback_proxy_supply, which
> are used in case the power domain is not specified.
> 
> So no driver change is necessary in the mss driver for both old and new
> devicetrees, but the adsp driver does not have this fallback, so that's why
> the adsp config is updated.
> 
> Does that make it clear?

Yes. Would it make sense to implement fallback_proxy_supply for ADSP
too?

> 
> Regards
> Luca

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry