[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250706115053.368ce9e9@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2025 11:50:53 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, Stephen Rothwell
<sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Jonathan Santos
<Jonathan.Santos@...log.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iio tree with the spi tree
On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 07:28:07 -0500
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com> wrote:
> On 7/3/25 3:31 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 16:38:24 +1000
> > Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Today's linux-next merge of the iio tree got a conflict in:
> >>
> >> MAINTAINERS
> >>
> >> between commit:
> >>
> >> e47a324d6f07 ("dt-bindings: trigger-source: add ADI Util Sigma-Delta SPI")
> >>
> >> from the spi tree and commit:
> >>
> >> 0dd88eaa7126 ("dt-bindings: trigger-source: add generic GPIO trigger source")
> >>
> >> from the iio tree.
> >>
> >> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> >> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> >> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> >> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> >> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> >> complex conflicts.
> >>
> > Thanks Stephen,
> >
> > David, do you prefer these merged or kept as separate entries?
>
> Ah, shoot, I forgot that we had added the gpio one and just made
> one section like this.
>
> I think it would make sense to also merge the new adi one with
> the reset to keep things compact.
>
Is there a path to do that cleanly given the multiple trees things are
coming from? Maybe this is a let things resolve whatever way this cycle
and tidy up next?
> >
> > I don't think it matters either way in practice though this is the
> > more complex merge (the other being just putting the blocks in order.
> >
> > We can put a note in the pull request on preference but ultimately Linus
> > will resolve this however he prefers!
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> >
> >> --
> >> Cheers,
> >> Stephen Rothwell
> >>
> >> diff --cc MAINTAINERS
> >> index dd764b947dab,d0809d62ff48..000000000000
> >> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> >> @@@ -25333,19 -25201,15 +25341,20 @@@ TRADITIONAL CHINESE DOCUMENTATIO
> >> M: Hu Haowen <2023002089@...k.tyut.edu.cn>
> >> S: Maintained
> >> W: https://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc
> >> -T: git git://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc.git doc-zh-tw
> >> +T: git https://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc.git doc-zh-tw
> >> F: Documentation/translations/zh_TW/
> >>
> >> + TRIGGER SOURCE
> >> + M: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
> >> + S: Maintained
> >> + F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/gpio-trigger.yaml
> >> + F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/pwm-trigger.yaml
> >> +
> >> +TRIGGER SOURCE - ADI UTIL SIGMA DELTA SPI
> >> +M: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
> >> +S: Maintained
> >> +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/adi,util-sigma-delta-spi.yaml
> >> +
> >> - TRIGGER SOURCE - PWM
> >> - M: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
> >> - S: Maintained
> >> - F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/pwm-trigger.yaml
> >> -
> >> TRUSTED SECURITY MODULE (TSM) INFRASTRUCTURE
> >> M: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> >> L: linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists