linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Optimize notifiers registration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <175198844540.786463.17262807646940735306.b4-ty@arm.com>
Date: Tue,  8 Jul 2025 16:30:24 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org,
	Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
	peng.fan@....nxp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Optimize notifiers registration

On Mon, 07 Jul 2025 15:42:20 +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> Some platforms could be configured not to support notification events from
> specific sources and such a case is already handled properly by avoiding
> even to attempt to send a notification enable request since it would be
> doomed to fail anyway.
> 
> In an extreme scenario, though, a platform could support not even one
> single source on a specific event: in such a case would be meaningless to
> even allow to register a notifier and we can bail-out immediately, saving
> a lot of needless computation.
> 
> [...]

Applied to sudeep.holla/linux (for-next/scmi/updates), thanks!
(with some commit message changes)

[1/1] firmware: arm_scmi: Optimize notifiers registration
      https://git.kernel.org/sudeep.holla/c/b5daf93b809d
--
Regards,
Sudeep