lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9ae0d97b-e68d-4255-8ab5-18007763babd@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 17:29:00 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Asutosh Das <quic_asutoshd@...cinc.com>,
        Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
Cc: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        Can Guo <quic_cang@...cinc.com>,
        Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC/RFT 2/5] ufs: ufs-qcom: Remove inferred MCQ mappings

On 7/7/25 7:51 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 7/4/25 10:36 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> There are currently no platforms with MCQ enabled, so there is no
>> functional change.
> 
> Hmm ... my understanding is that your employer provides multiple
> development boards that support MCQ?

The commit message refers to the state of the upstream kernel, where
none of the platforms we support today use MCQ (which I can tell as
it would require describing an additional register region in DT).

Konrad

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ