[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f93f68fd-8dd7-415a-98b6-a95c031fb986@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 13:57:24 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@...dia.com>, "Maciej
Wieczor-Retman" <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>, Peter Newman
<peternewman@...gle.com>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>, Babu Moger
<babu.moger@....com>, Drew Fustini <dfustini@...libre.com>, Dave Martin
<Dave.Martin@....com>, Anil Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
CC: <x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<patches@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/30] x86,fs/resctrl: Refactor domain_remove_cpu_mon()
ready for new domain types
Hi Tony,
On 6/26/25 9:49 AM, Tony Luck wrote:
> Historically all monitoring events have been associated with the L3
> resource. This will change when support for telemetry events is added.
>
> The RDT_RESOURCE_L3 resource carries a lot of state in the domain
> structures which needs to be dealt with when a domain is taken offline
> by removing the last CPU in the domain.
>
> Refactor domain_remove_cpu_mon() so all the L3 processing is separated
> from general actions of clearing the CPU bit in the mask and removing
> directories from mon_data.
>
> resctrl_offline_mon_domain() will still need to remove domain specific
"resctrl_offline_mon_domain() will still need to" -> "resctrl_offline_mon_domain()
needs to"?
> directories and files from the "mon_data" directories, but can skip the
> L3 resource specific cleanup when called for other resource types.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
> ---
Assuming [1] is applied, this patch looks good to me.
Reinette
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/aF3lRKURweT4mhAj@agluck-desk3/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists