linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 03/32] clk: at91: clk-sam9x60-pll: use clk_parent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4f45e4d3-9b06-4669-ac1c-c277b9402831@tuxon.dev>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 13:05:55 +0300
From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>
To: Ryan Wanner <ryan.wanner@...rochip.com>, mturquette@...libre.com,
 sboyd@...nel.org, nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com
Cc: robh@...nel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 varshini.rajendran@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/32] clk: at91: clk-sam9x60-pll: use clk_parent_data

Hi, Ryan,


On 07.07.2025 18:24, Ryan Wanner wrote:
>> Same for the rest of patches in this series following the "Remove SoC
>> specific driver changes" approach.
> Would the best approach be to make every patch atomic and change every
> SoC to match each clock function change 

Yes, this one.

Thank you,
Claudiu

> or put back in the sama7g54
> clock driver changes that where combined?