linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] riscv: kprobes: Clean up instruction simulation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250708102537.VovauOQC@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 12:25:37 +0200
From: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
To: patchwork-bot+linux-riscv@...nel.org
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
	palmer@...belt.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu, alex@...ti.fr,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] riscv: kprobes: Clean up instruction simulation

On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 02:33:06PM +0000, patchwork-bot+linux-riscv@...nel.org wrote:
> Hello:
> 
> This series was applied to riscv/linux.git (for-next)
> by Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>:
> 
> On Wed, 14 May 2025 11:38:39 +0200 you wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > There is some instruction-processing code in kprobes simulate code. These
> > code should be insn.h. In fact, most of them is duplicating insn.h.
> > 
> > This series remove the duplicated bits and make use of macros already
> > defined in insn.h. The non-duplicated bits are moved into insn.h.
> > 
> > [...]
> 
> Here is the summary with links:
>   - [v2,01/11] riscv: kprobes: Move branch_rs2_idx to insn.h
>     https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/d29656bab74c
>   - [v2,02/11] riscv: kprobes: Move branch_funct3 to insn.h
>     https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/da6de46c2eed
>   - [v2,03/11] riscv: kprobes: Remove duplication of RV_EXTRACT_JTYPE_IMM
>     https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/6d47d903b18f
>   - [v2,04/11] riscv: kprobes: Remove duplication of RV_EXTRACT_RS1_REG
>     https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/5cefc323f32a
>   - [v2,05/11] riscv: kprobes: Remove duplication of RV_EXTRACT_BTYPE_IMM
>     https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/a285674909ae
>   - [v2,06/11] riscv: kproves: Remove duplication of RVC_EXTRACT_JTYPE_IMM
>     https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/c7196c136e29
>   - [v2,07/11] riscv: kprobes: Remove duplication of RVC_EXTRACT_C2_RS1_REG
>     https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/768007ca3fe8
>   - [v2,08/11] riscv: kprobes: Remove duplication of RVC_EXTRACT_BTYPE_IMM
>     https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/f2c715fff676
>   - [v2,09/11] riscv: kprobes: Remove duplication of RV_EXTRACT_RD_REG
>     https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/284ca2a100de
>   - [v2,10/11] riscv: kprobes: Remove duplication of RV_EXTRACT_UTYPE_IMM
>     https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/a60c2933ec74
>   - [v2,11/11] riscv: kprobes: Remove duplication of RV_EXTRACT_ITYPE_IMM
>     https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/ee4c45f5cbeb

This series was dropped from 6.16 due to conflict. Can it be re-applied? It
applies cleanly to riscv/for-next.

The same story for:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/174904758974.2309006.8809303189389627595.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org/

Best regards,
Nam