linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] riscv: kprobes: Clean up instruction simulation

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Message-ID: <9bf5fc76-4bb2-4baf-88fe-e593b451f0ff@ghiti.fr>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 15:27:23 +0200
From: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>
To: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>, patchwork-bot+linux-riscv@...nel.org
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
 palmer@...belt.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] riscv: kprobes: Clean up instruction simulation

Hi Nam,

On 7/8/25 12:25, Nam Cao wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 02:33:06PM +0000, patchwork-bot+linux-riscv@...nel.org wrote:
>> Hello:
>>
>> This series was applied to riscv/linux.git (for-next)
>> by Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>:
>>
>> On Wed, 14 May 2025 11:38:39 +0200 you wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> There is some instruction-processing code in kprobes simulate code. These
>>> code should be insn.h. In fact, most of them is duplicating insn.h.
>>>
>>> This series remove the duplicated bits and make use of macros already
>>> defined in insn.h. The non-duplicated bits are moved into insn.h.
>>>
>>> [...]
>> Here is the summary with links:
>>    - [v2,01/11] riscv: kprobes: Move branch_rs2_idx to insn.h
>>      https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/d29656bab74c
>>    - [v2,02/11] riscv: kprobes: Move branch_funct3 to insn.h
>>      https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/da6de46c2eed
>>    - [v2,03/11] riscv: kprobes: Remove duplication of RV_EXTRACT_JTYPE_IMM
>>      https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/6d47d903b18f
>>    - [v2,04/11] riscv: kprobes: Remove duplication of RV_EXTRACT_RS1_REG
>>      https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/5cefc323f32a
>>    - [v2,05/11] riscv: kprobes: Remove duplication of RV_EXTRACT_BTYPE_IMM
>>      https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/a285674909ae
>>    - [v2,06/11] riscv: kproves: Remove duplication of RVC_EXTRACT_JTYPE_IMM
>>      https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/c7196c136e29
>>    - [v2,07/11] riscv: kprobes: Remove duplication of RVC_EXTRACT_C2_RS1_REG
>>      https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/768007ca3fe8
>>    - [v2,08/11] riscv: kprobes: Remove duplication of RVC_EXTRACT_BTYPE_IMM
>>      https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/f2c715fff676
>>    - [v2,09/11] riscv: kprobes: Remove duplication of RV_EXTRACT_RD_REG
>>      https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/284ca2a100de
>>    - [v2,10/11] riscv: kprobes: Remove duplication of RV_EXTRACT_UTYPE_IMM
>>      https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/a60c2933ec74
>>    - [v2,11/11] riscv: kprobes: Remove duplication of RV_EXTRACT_ITYPE_IMM
>>      https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/ee4c45f5cbeb
> This series was dropped from 6.16 due to conflict. Can it be re-applied? It
> applies cleanly to riscv/for-next.
>
> The same story for:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/174904758974.2309006.8809303189389627595.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org/

Yes, I have both in my for-next branch, sorry I did not advertise that 
(I'm working on it).

FYI, I have enabled kunit tests in the upstream kernel CI: 
https://github.com/linux-riscv/linux/actions/runs/15967114709/job/45030410210?pr=571#step:5:625

Thanks,

Alex

>
> Best regards,
> Nam
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives