[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <f0275a4c-9801-4288-91fd-e28aa4bc5b7e@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2025 15:36:49 +0200
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Charles Keepax" <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: "Maciej Strozek" <mstrozek@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
"Liam Girdwood" <lgirdwood@...il.com>, "Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"Jaroslav Kysela" <perex@...ex.cz>, "Takashi Iwai" <tiwai@...e.com>,
"Shuming Fan" <shumingf@...ltek.com>,
"Bard Liao" <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
"Pierre-Louis Bossart" <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.dev>,
"Peter Ujfalusi" <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>,
"Kuninori Morimoto" <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: SDCA: fix HID dependency
On Wed, Jul 9, 2025, at 14:38, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 08:46:06PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>
>> config SND_SOC_SDCA_HID
>> - tristate "SDCA HID support"
>> + bool "SDCA HID support"
>> depends on SND_SOC_SDCA && HID
>> + depends on HID=y || HID=SND_SOC_SDCA
>
> Does it perhaps make more sense to add a (HID || !HID) dependency
> on SND_SOC_SDCA and leave the dependencies here alone? I feel
> like that lets the Kconfig figure out the right settings for
> SND_SOC_SDCA automatically, rather than just disappearing the SDCA
> HID option when HID and SDCA are set incompatibly.
The problem is that SND_SOC_SDCA is not a user-visible option
but instead gets selected by SND_SOC_ACPI_INTEL_SDCA_QUIRKS,
which itself gets selected indirectly.
It could work, but then the 'depends on HID || !HID' would
need to be under SND_SST_ATOM_HIFI2_PLATFORM_ACPI and anything
else that might select SND_SOC_ACPI_INTEL_MATCH,
SND_SOC_ACPI_INTEL_SDCA_QUIRKS, or SND_SOC_SDCA in the future.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists