[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <68dfc6b7-1083-44dc-bdaf-4fc09e944671@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 20:03:30 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@...aro.org>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/12] pinctrl: qcom: mark the `gpio` and `egpio` pins
function as non-strict functions
On 7/9/25 4:39 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
>
> Allow pins muxed to the "gpio" or "egpio" function to be requested as
> GPIOs even if pinmux_ops say the controller should be strict.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
heads up for +Luca, I'm not sure how your Milos addition will
stack up chronologically
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists