linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/13] netfs, cifs: Fixes to retry-related code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2738562.1752092552@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2025 21:22:32 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@...os.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
    Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>, Paulo Alcantara <pc@...guebit.com>,
    netfs@...ts.linux.dev, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
    linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
    ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, v9fs@...ts.linux.dev,
    linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
    stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] netfs, cifs: Fixes to retry-related code

Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@...os.com> wrote:

>      kworker/8:1-437     [008] ...1.   107.149531: netfs_rreq:
> R=00000065 2C WAKE-Q  f=80002020
>
> ...
> (The above was 6.15.5 plus all patches in this PR.)

Can you check that, please?  If you have patch 12 applied, then the flags
should be renumbered and there shouldn't be a NETFS_RREQ_ flag with 13, but
f=80002020 would seem to have 0x2000 (ie. bit 13) set in it.

If you do have it applied, then this might be an indicator of the issue.

David